This website aims to study the globalist narratives that might be offered to humanity for not all the good reasons. We have dealt with many of them during the course of the last seven months. We jokingly made a list of beliefs that would be ideal to be considered ‘an ideal citizen’ from the perspective of these globalist organizations (1).

Besides all the current day stories there is also the territory of our history: could it be that when it comes to our history we are also manipulated into accepting a certain interpretation of historical events? We all know the saying that victors determine the truth.

The victors in the Second World War on both the Western and the Eastern front might have their own take on what happened during that war. Let’s take for instance the two nuclear bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the US. This was an obvious war crime killing many tens of thousands of civilians, but somehow it was hailed in our history books as the bombs that made an end to the war, as if they were some kind of nuclear peace doves.

Could it be that there are many more of these examples that we are not allowed to know? In an interview with historian Darryl Cooper he talks about this phenomenon that certain events may not be questioned, at least not when they might defy parts of the ‘state religion’. Let’s listen to how the Cooper explains it himself in September 2024 during an interview with Tucker Carlson (1):

ON EMOTIONAL TRIGGERS BUILT INTO PEOPLE
In the above excerpt Cooper said: “The event is such a core part of the state religion that there are emotional triggers built into people since childhood that almost prevent them from taking an approach that might lead them to information or conclusions that are nor part of the state religion version of that event.“

Tucker Carlson aptly added that it is not just the second world war that is uniquely censored or protected, the mythology around it, it’s every event that is central to a nation’s understanding of itself, and that changes over time.

SOME REFLECTIONS
Cooper says that often certain interpretations are defended by certain deeply ingrained taboos. I noticed I felt some reluctance to write that piece about the changes of the number of people killed at Auschwitz (3). From 1945 to the beginning of the 1990s there was a sign at the entrance that described 4 million Jews had died, but it was replaced by a monument that read that 1,5 million people had died after the fall of the Soviet Union. Is it forbidden to describe facts like this? Is this already triggering some taboos?

After what we have seen during the censorship of information surrounding the covid-19 pandemic and the vaccines, together with all the other globalist stories on climate, gender confusion, Ukraine and Israel etc. we might take some time to invest in taking a closer look at certain important historical events, too.

FOOTNOTES
(1) x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1830652074746409246
(2) Translational Inefficiencies In R&D: The Blind Men And The Elephant
(3) Number of Deaths in Auschwitz reduced from 4 million to 1.1 Million in the 1990s

Image is from (2) depicting different blind men asked to explain what they feel by only touching a particular part of the elephant. Perhaps we are only allowed to touch certain parts of our history and not others?