One of the favorite narratives that is pushed by the elite globalist movement is that of an alleged climate emergency. For years we have been told that there is a scientific consensus on man-made climate change, and everyone who dared to question is was treated like some holocaust denier or some crazy ‘conspiracy theorist’ (1). It turns out there is no such consensus. What is becoming more likely is that the huge media-science complex has used its influence to manipulate the world in accepting this climate change narrative. The goal would be to gain more influence, control and make a lot of money on it.

Over 1900 scientists and professionals (including Nobel Prize winners) have signed a declaration, called the World Climate Declaration (2,3). The declaration calls for a less political and more scientific approach to the study of climate. It brings forth a number of strong arguments that directly question the dominating globalist dogma on climate change. What follows is the literal declaration in which I added a few links to other related articles on this website:

THE WORLD CLIMATE DECLARATION
“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. In particular, scientists should emphasize that their modeling output is not the result of magic: computer models are human-made. What comes out is fully dependent on what theoreticians and programmers have put in: hypotheses, assumptions, relationships, parameterizations, stability constraints, etc. Unfortunately, in mainstream climate science most of this input is undeclared.

To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in.  This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models. In the future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.

THERE IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY
A global network of over 1900 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message. Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.

NATURAL AS WELL AS ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS CAUSE WARMING
The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.

WARMING IS FAR SLOWER THAN PREDICTED
The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change (4).

FAILING CLIMATE MODELS
Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO₂. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO₂ is beneficial.

CO₂ IS PLANT FOOD, THEN BASIS OF ALL LIFE ON EARTH
CO₂ is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO₂ is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO₂ in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide (5-7).

GLOBAL WARMING HAS NOT INCREASED NATURAL DISASTERS
There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO₂-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly (8-9).

CLIMATE POLICY MUST RESPECT SCIENTIFIC AND ECONOMIC REALITIES
There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO₂ policy proposed for 2050. If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and re-adapt. The aim of global policy should be ‘prosperity for all’ by providing reliable and affordable energy at all times. In a prosperous society men and women are well educated, birthrates are low and people care about their environment.

EPILOGUE
The World Climate Declaration (WCD) has brought a large variety of competent scientists together from all over the world. The considerable knowledge and experience of this group is indispensable in reaching a balanced, dispassionate and competent view of climate change.” (2,3)

A member of the Gondolath Team pointed to the work of Danish scientists who proved that we are actually living in one of the coldest periods in the last 10,000 years (11). Below you can see a screenshot from the results based on digging into the ice of Greenland. We accidentally started measuring our temperatures when we were at the coldest point in the last 8,000 years (12).

FOOTNOTES
(1) Learning to Recognize Key Deep State Jargon like ‘Conspiracy Theorist’
(2) World Climate Declaration (website)
(3) World Climate Declaration (pdf)
(4) Failing Climate Models
(5) A Rise in Temperature Triggers a rise in CO2 – Not the other way round
(6) Lowest CO2-Levels in the last 600 Million Years
(7) Comparing CO2-levels and Temperatures in Modern Times
(8) The EU Emission Trading System
(9) Carbon Removal Plants
(10) Inconvenient Facts 3 & 7 CO2 is plant food – YouTube
(11) We Live in Cold Times
(12) It is interesting to note that below this video on Youtube (11) we can read the following automatic comment sponsored by the United Nations: “United Nations • Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. Human activities have been the main driver of climate change, primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas.”
See (13) for more on this manipulative cooperation between the UN and Google.
(13) United Nations partner with Google to Influence Search Results

Image on top is from (3)